How the Army is Looking at Avoiding War

By |2019-08-07T16:00:29-04:00August 5th, 2019|Institute for Polarities of Democracy, Polarity Thinking|

Umm. OK. Check this out… A new book, titled “Empirical Paradox, Complexity Thinking and Generating New Kinds of Knowledge” by Dr. Bruce West, a senior scientist at the Army Research Office, uses mathematical modeling to address why thinking in terms of either/or outcomes means the inevitability of another world war. (JULY 23, 2019 by U.S. Army [...]

A Blueprint to Revive American Democracy

By |2019-08-05T18:54:25-04:00August 4th, 2019|Freedom and Authority, Institute for Polarities of Democracy, Polarity Thinking|

Many writers now say we’re in code blue, and we need a blueprint to revive American Democracy. In his Washington Post August 4th review of two books Carlos Lazoda highlights how in the weeks after Donald Trump’s inauguration, the muse of the death-of-democracy bookshelf began expanding – and not focused exclusively on Trump. He says, “The [...]

Polarity Theory and Integral Theory: The Polarities in the Integral “Multarity” (Interdependencies of more than two)

By |2019-06-08T14:20:59-04:00June 7th, 2019|Institute for Polarities of Democracy, Multarities, Polarity Thinking|

In 1967, C. West Churchman highlighted some key factors of unsolvable challenges. He referred to them as “Wicked Problems,” which are: 1) Unsolvable by rational analysis, 2) Systems issues, and 3) Require collective engagement for learning the way to solutions. Another important voice in the solvability discernment arena is Ron Heifetz, who made the clear [...]

Halakha (or Halachah) and Aggadah: Honoring a Polarity in the Jewish Tradition for Passover

By |2020-03-11T11:38:22-04:00April 20th, 2019|Polarity Thinking|

Ancient wisdom and so salient for today. Halakha (or Halachah) represents the strength to shape one's life according to a fixed pattern; it is a form-giving force.  Aggadah is the expression of human kind’s ceaseless striving, which often defies all limitations. Robert Cover, a twentieth century Yale Law School professor wrote in Nomos and Narrative, [...]

Top 10 Realities of All Polarities: A Brief Summary and More Thorough Explanation

By |2019-04-16T08:46:23-04:00April 16th, 2019|Polarity Thinking, Polarity Thinking and Problem-solving Thinking|

They are interdependent pairs that need each other over time and energy systems in which we live in and which live in us. Polarities have been important in history and in our lives. Polarities go by different names: Paradox, Dilemma, Tensions, etc. Leaders, teams, and organizations that leverage polarities well outperform those who don’t. Each [...]

Support for the Seeing Step 1: The Important Distinction Between Technical and Adaptive Thinking

By |2019-04-14T11:54:25-04:00April 14th, 2019|Polarity Thinking|

Summary of “Team of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for A Complex World” by retired Army General Stanley McChrystal “If there is a single key point that stands head and shoulders above the rest in my mind, it is this: The never-ending quest for efficiency must give way to a tireless effort to ensure adaptability…” [...]

Polarity, paradox, tension, dilemma in Leader Transition

By |2019-04-14T11:51:08-04:00April 11th, 2019|Polarity Thinking|

Polarities (paradoxes and dilemmas) have been the grist of human awareness and study for more than 5,000 years. Despite efforts to reduce problems and solutions to simple either/or configurations, the authors assert that the need for both/and, polarity thinking is necessary to maximize successful transitions. Freeman (2004) states that learning and actively using both/and, polarity [...]

Growing a Culture of Purpose and Trust: Leveraging Leader, Team, and Organizational Polarities

By |2019-03-25T14:58:06-04:00March 25th, 2019|Polarity Thinking|

Success today and in the future requires critical distinctions be made in the type of thinking that’s needed for challenges and opportunities. One type of thinking addresses complicated and solvable technical problems using “either/or.” Another type of thinking addresses complexity for technically unsolvable adaptive “polarity” challenges using “both/and.” Polarities are interdependent pairs that all leaders, [...]

Top 10 Easy Mistakes or Habits to Break When Learning/Applying Polarity Thinking

By |2019-04-16T08:31:53-04:00March 23rd, 2019|Polarity Thinking|

Advocating for “Both/And” thinking as a replacement for “Either/Or” thinking. Example: “We need to get away from ‘Either/Or’ thinking and use ‘Both/And’. “ Using “verses” as a conjunction for the two poles instead of “and”. Example: “We’ve got a polarity of Structure versus Flexibility.” Describing the two poles of a polarity in a negative-to-positive, with [...]

Go to Top